 | | Re: Home layouts (Re: Huge layout) —Steve Chapple
|
| | | (...) A nice layout, but why didn't you make it possible for trains to switch from one loop to the other - why the isolation? SRC L#765 StRuCtures (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Home layouts (Re: Huge layout) —Frank Buiting
|
| | | | "Steve Chapple" <LEGOArches@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GCrxBw.Mx2@lugnet.com... (...) The main reason is that I want to have multiple trains on the track and I'm not sure what would happen if two transformers behave when accidently get (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Home layouts (Re: Huge layout) —Dwayne Towell
|
| | | | (...) I was in charge of powering the train for the 3000+' attempt at PNLTC's G2K World Record attempt. We used 10 or 12 power supplies on a single very long track. As long as the polarity is set right, we detected no ill effects. The train speed (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Home layouts (Re: Huge layout) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) A simple examination of the electronics says that there is almost no possibility of a problem if the two controllers are set to the same polarity. (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
