 | | Re: The Royal Train Website
|
|
(...) It's complex but not undoable. Several people/orgs have done it. The "old" (1) "main" (2) GMLTC layout had a turntable as well. Mindstorms actuated/animated. I believe the indubitable J1(3) has expounded on how it worked. It was pretty nifty (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
|
|
(...) But why would Lego create a new mold, to continue making a part that worked perfectly well as it was? The change prevents the piece from being backwards-compatible with 4.5v track, and doesn't seem to offer any advantages in structural (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
|
|
(...) part (...) Yep. The non slotted ones are from sets that did not use it as train track, as the ties fit into the slots. I believe that 6761 is not unique in having pieces like this, but don't hold me to it! James P (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
|
|
Today, I was looking at a 6761 with the thought of parting a few out. That set contains two parts that I would describe as a 1 x 16 tile with a raised serated edge lengthwise on the top. Examination of the bottom shows a p/n of 3228. Partsref tells (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
|
Mookie <Mookie1@telocity.com> wrote in message news:3A50AF77.393534...ity.com... (...) look at (...) That reminds me I should try to run over to his place while I'm still in Chicago. I've been meaning to for quite some time, hopefully he has his (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
