 | | Re: The Royal Train Website
|
|
(...) It's complex but not undoable. Several people/orgs have done it. The "old" (1) "main" (2) GMLTC layout had a turntable as well. Mindstorms actuated/animated. I believe the indubitable J1(3) has expounded on how it worked. It was pretty nifty (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
|
|
(...) But why would Lego create a new mold, to continue making a part that worked perfectly well as it was? The change prevents the piece from being backwards-compatible with 4.5v track, and doesn't seem to offer any advantages in structural (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
|
|
(...) part (...) Yep. The non slotted ones are from sets that did not use it as train track, as the ties fit into the slots. I believe that 6761 is not unique in having pieces like this, but don't hold me to it! James P (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
|
|
Today, I was looking at a 6761 with the thought of parting a few out. That set contains two parts that I would describe as a 1 x 16 tile with a raised serated edge lengthwise on the top. Examination of the bottom shows a p/n of 3228. Partsref tells (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
|
Mookie <Mookie1@telocity.com> wrote in message news:3A50AF77.393534...ity.com... (...) look at (...) That reminds me I should try to run over to his place while I'm still in Chicago. I've been meaning to for quite some time, hopefully he has his (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Royal Train Website
|
|
This is absolutely stunning!! Not just the layout, but the pictures too. How on earth did you get your photo's to look so damn good? Most look like raytrace (And that's meant as a compliment here!). I'd love to see more pics of the turntable. Even (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest MOC-- a Chateau
|
|
Great job John! Impressive building. I especially agree with Chris here, it's great to see the real thing.... Duq "Chris Gray" <cg@ami-cg.GraySage.COM> wrote in message news:m3ofxsij2x.fsf@...age.COM... (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | RE: MOC: Bridges for Trains
|
|
(...) I agree...the bridges look cool, but please reduce your pictures to a reasonable size, like somewhere between 640x480 and 1024x768. Thanks! --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (URL) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Bridges for Trains
|
|
(...) How'd you manage to accumulate so many beams? :-) That's been my primary problem since LEGO discontinued the beams parts pack. (I feel sorry for those with a slow connection - even with DSL I didn't wait for the full photos to load...) SRC (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Bridges for Trains
|
|
Wow! That is Technic at its best. Super designs. -- Bob Fay California, USA rfay@we.mediaone.net (URL) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.trains)
|
