 | | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
4439 - automated switched! Looks like sets can use existing track! So happy.... Bryan Kinkel Paul Rutenberg <paul_germany@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FsA9v1.9Cs@lugnet.com... (...) gtfthis is (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
(...) MOC's I've seen around here. And that's not bad! Fredrik (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
Thank you for posting these fantastic pictures! Just looking at the models, we can all see that trains these don't look like Town Jr. I can't wait to see exactly what the new features of these trains are. Looking at 2.jpg, I see the word "PC" in (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
|
Hello Look at following link, about time we get something before the USA, gtfthis is a scan of of upcoming sets for Lego end of the year, YEAHHH...HHH: (URL) happy 9V Trasin Collector and builder Paul (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains) !!
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
(...) Good point. Perhaps instead of setting a length standard (although that is useful when calculating siding capacity) the standard should speak to the envelope of clearance that must be provided. (there must be 4 studs clearance from the edge of (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 x 6 train nosepiece
|
|
"Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:38E35260.3D0D@m...ing.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) To complete the train front end you also need this roof piece: (URL) have only seen it in grey and black: Grey: 4563 - (URL) - (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
I knew that there was something I forgot to include! I think 16 was what we mentioned for tunnel clearances. I LOVED Brian Williams' suggestion of having the entrance to the tunnel removable so that a smaller or larger "mouth" could be added to look (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
I'm not sure that we've really set a hard top yet. By guess is that 14 will be probably the high end, mostly because the tunnels start to look really silly if they need to let through cars that are taller than that. A lot of that will depend on how (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
(...) 8x44 but I am not sure about the height. John Kelly? Note that 8x44 allows 7xM and 6xN (where N>M>44) due to curve effects, although I am not quite sure what the values of M and N are. That's why I personally am pleased to see layouts (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Legomodular standards?
|
|
(...) point. For (...) Yes. You are correct, Sir! And, briefly, that means that the two outputs are tied together. The more difference in voltage values, theoretically the more strain is placed on the power supplies. However, actually, these (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
