 | | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
I knew that there was something I forgot to include! I think 16 was what we mentioned for tunnel clearances. I LOVED Brian Williams' suggestion of having the entrance to the tunnel removable so that a smaller or larger "mouth" could be added to look (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
I'm not sure that we've really set a hard top yet. By guess is that 14 will be probably the high end, mostly because the tunnels start to look really silly if they need to let through cars that are taller than that. A lot of that will depend on how (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
(...) 8x44 but I am not sure about the height. John Kelly? Note that 8x44 allows 7xM and 6xN (where N>M>44) due to curve effects, although I am not quite sure what the values of M and N are. That's why I personally am pleased to see layouts (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Legomodular standards?
|
|
(...) point. For (...) Yes. You are correct, Sir! And, briefly, that means that the two outputs are tied together. The more difference in voltage values, theoretically the more strain is placed on the power supplies. However, actually, these (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Legomodular standards?
|
|
(...) The thing that I keep wondering about is when the motor is over the break point. For a brief time BOTH motor pickups are on two different circuits... Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
