 | | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
(...) 8x44 but I am not sure about the height. John Kelly? Note that 8x44 allows 7xM and 6xN (where N>M>44) due to curve effects, although I am not quite sure what the values of M and N are. That's why I personally am pleased to see layouts (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Legomodular standards?
|
|
(...) point. For (...) Yes. You are correct, Sir! And, briefly, that means that the two outputs are tied together. The more difference in voltage values, theoretically the more strain is placed on the power supplies. However, actually, these (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Legomodular standards?
|
|
(...) The thing that I keep wondering about is when the motor is over the break point. For a brief time BOTH motor pickups are on two different circuits... Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
Is there going to be a standard size car/rolling stock standard? i.e.,clearance on all tracks for something 8x44x14 (or whatever) I would think that this would be just as important as standard track interfaces and such, as this is going to be the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
(...) ...Well, since most of the terrain is red bricks, it could also be shielding from the rolling rivers of lava... :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wamalug guy ((URL) #160 (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
