 | | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
(...) I'm certainly not up on all the intricacies of trademark law, but I would think that there is a difference between what you use to describe your layout, and the name applied to a published standard. I'm just suggesting that this issue be (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
If they come to me and tell me that I can't call my Lego train layout that has about a half-million of their bricks in it and costs tens of thousands of dollars a Lego-modular layout, I will retort that they would prefer it to a Megablock-modular (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
(...) of it's trademarks. We probably should either get permission to name the standard LEGO-Modular, or find a different name (but maybe I'm all wet). (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 x 6 train nosepiece
|
|
(...) Well, I found the post I was looking for, it was on RTL, here's a pointer: (URL) here's the listing of these parts (as noted in that thread, 4561 has a similar looking nose, but it is integrated with the engine plate): The sets and colors I (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | First anniversary of my homepage....
|
|
Although it seems to me that I'm active in internet and Lego since ever, it's just a year ago today that I launched my own homepage. It became Cool Site of the Week just one month later and has grown and updated continously during the past year. So (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
