 | | Re: New RC Trains Are Posted on LEGO.COM
|
|
(...) Yes, that could be... that's why I was asking, since I know some of the people that frequent this list have had a test run with the new trains. (...) Hmmm, that might even be a translation issue between US english and CAN english. As far as I (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New RC Trains Are Posted on LEGO.COM
|
|
(...) According to instructions (available from LEGO.COM) loco for set 7898 needs 6 AA batteries and remote needs 3 AA batteries. Saso (20 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New RC Trains Are Posted on LEGO.COM
|
|
(...) I think you're reading too much into what's probably a translation from the original. It says 'remote control', not 'controller' anyway. 6 for the train, yes. I didn't see inside the remote of David's preview one, but 3 AAs giving you 4.5V (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New RC Trains Are Posted on LEGO.COM
|
|
(...) I think that's unlikely. More likely they'll just put the new parts on LEGO Factory so you can assemble your own track packs. Clearly, they still can't count how many curves it takes to rectify a point though. Jason R (20 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD Signal Box for Save 9V Trains Contest (and John Neal)
|
|
(...) The reason that low sloped roof had little bobbles on the end instead of ridges all the way along the top was becaue I only ended up with two 2x2 33° ridges. I think it actually looks better like that. No ridges in LDD though. Jason R (20 years ago, 30-Jun-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
