 | | Re: Canadian National SD40-2 Diesel Engine V2
|
|
"John" <John@TCLTC.org> wrote in message news:H3q8IE.Fus@lugnet.com... (...) an (...) always (...) which (...) some (...) I (...) better (...) but (...) say (...) which (...) frames (...) your (...) simply (...) arrangement (...) and (...) So what (...) (22 years ago, 9-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: My Santa Fe Train Kit Theories
|
|
(...) My observation : Most LEGO engines are simply too light! The motor has more power, but it can't be transferred onto the track because of the lack of grip. With my 4551 Crocodiles and my MOC DB211 I added some weight bricks, as found in old 12v (...) (22 years ago, 9-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: My Santa Fe Train Kit Theories // ignorance in lugnet.trains?
|
|
(...) Hi Ben, Thanks for your insightful response. When I placed my original post I wondered if anyone would reply at all. I assumed that it would only depend on the content of my post being something people cared to comment on. Bert's comment (...) (22 years ago, 9-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Trains arrive at Target in SoCal
|
|
"George Notel" <lego@notelin.com> wrote in message news:H3LCB1.5wt@lugnet.com... (...) Is (...) the (...) $140 (...) :-) I really hate people that open the boxes in the stores... I actually bought the set when I was down in Seattle this past (...) (22 years ago, 9-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Canadian National SD40-2 Diesel Engine V2
|
|
(...) Not *exactly* (the main difference would be number of fans on the top), but close enough. Even *with* the "incorrect" number of fans (which is not to say that that particular configuration could have existed with modifications, which happened (...) (22 years ago, 9-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
