| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
Looks like it's working fine now, JT. Thanks and hope you feel better soon! -John (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
Ok I add the missing </FRAME> tag, let me know if it works now with Netscape. Thanks, jt (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
Thanks Bill for pointing that out, I'll try and update it this evening. I've come down with the flu (or more like my son gave me the flu) so I'm a little slow at working on it this week. jt (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
(...) I get a blank page on Netscape 4.78 on Windows 2000. I think the problem is a missing </FRAME> tag. If you directly load the page it works fine: (URL) William R Ward bill@wards.net (URL) If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Lowest (legit) number yet proudly enters service in the UK :-)
|
|
A1013 arrived today, along with A1036, not yet built. (URL) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
(...) ngltc home page is fine. -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com www.pnltc.org (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
(...) As of 11:15 on Feb 22, the registry page does nto appear under Netscape 4.76 under Windows. The asp won't load. Is this done by design? Paul S (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
|
(...) He said "Decent" not "Cute"... every club should have a Thomas(tm) but that doesn't mean I want LEGO(r) to dump effort into licensing it. Na, give us an A4 Mallard(1) (think of the compound curved pieces for that one!!!) 1 - check me on that, (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
|
(...) Heck yeah, a whole line of them (read: Thomas) -John (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
|
(...) Personally, I don't think 10000 is all that limited. I mean, even after Larry's placed his order[1] there'll still be plenty to go around. What production run would you expect of a set like this? I'm not a huge fan of forced 'collectibility', (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
(...) I thought it smelled a little odd. I was not sure, so I did not want to make any accusations... Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
Yeah, I guess someone thinks they're being funny. Since that's not Brad's email and he lives in New York. (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: Metroliner question
|
|
(...) High School Physics: To get the same efficiency from DC, we'd literally need a power station in every district of a city/town. Despite that, AC power distribution is High Voltage/Low Current (was DC the same?) as this ensures low power losses (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: Buffers
|
|
Using the responses, I've been able to check out the sets on Brickshelf; I'm not surprised I missed them first time round! Judging by the lack of other train related pieces in the box, I guess they are likely to have been sold as the single items (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
I noticed No. A0001 has been registred: (URL) A "James J. Trobaugh" <james@ngltc.org> wrote in message news:GrspzI.ow@lugnet.com... (...) special (...) list. (...) how (...) purely (...) the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: The wonderful Blacksmith Shop: Open Letter to Dan
|
|
I got mine yesterday, knew I was going to be very happy, right from seeing the beautiful box art (was expecting the half-disappointing black & white/gray "legends" style). Enjoyed putting it together - but the real seal of approval came from my 4 (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: wow - brickswest 2002
|
|
(...) Well, I was only able to attend for a few hours on Saturday, and I must say, that was some of the best few hours I've had in a long time! I finally got to see some of the creations I've been ooohing and awwing at over the past few years (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest, lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: Metroliner question
|
|
You may be correct, as I really have never seen or studied the systems of which we are referring. My aspects were only mere assumption. I base my hypothesis on a bit of history from the Edison era. In his thriving days of supplying power to the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: Metroliner question
|
|
(...) Well, the electric buses in San Francisco share one of their wires with the historic trolleys along Market St. I'm pretty sure the trolleys are D/C, or the tracks would represent a shock hazard, yes? --Bill. (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: I've got mine!!!
|
|
(...) right corner, making this picture seem like something for LEGO's advertising. I suggest selling them this picture. :) -Bryan (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|