| | Re: Santa Fe (10020) registry?
|
|
(...) James, This really is a good idea. I may even open the box to get the number. ;) It will be interesting to see how many of 10k you can record... and if Lego makes any doppelgängers. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: Santa Fe (10020) registry?
|
|
Yes, we'd want to track all of the units, even if they're never "commissioned" in to service. It would be interesting to see if a pattern apears for numbers here in the states versus sets sold in Europe and other parts of the world. I'll send you (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: Santa Fe (10020) registry?
|
|
(...) Cool. I will of course put a link to it from the .trains front page (remember folks, if you see things that maybe ought to be there, drop me a line). So would you want to collect all numbers from folks, even for ones bought for parts (I plan (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: 10020 at brickswest and what the Sr. VP of lego direct said
|
|
(...) I feel that it's not just width, you have to increase length a fair bit and height a small bit when you go to 8 wide, so I would argue that the brick increase is anywhere from 30% to 100%, tending toward the higher of that range. J2 disagrees, (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: 10020 at brickswest and what the Sr. VP of lego direct said
|
|
"Ahui Herrera" <jedi_agh@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GrrICE.HoK@lugnet.com... (...) done. Not to start another 6 vs. 8 wide debate, but I hope Lego Direct concentrates on the continued revival of the six wide, 9 volt train line and expanding (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|