|
| | Re: IOLTC the final word!!!!!!!!
|
| In lugnet.trains, Steven Barile writes: <explains yet again, but in the wrong group> I'm sorry that you're frustrated at yourself because you didn't communicate clearly enough for everyone the first time. People naturally have concerns when things (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | Unusual flatcar loads
|
| I posted this a long time ago, but never got a reply. Anyway, this is a page which shows some good loads for our flatcars. (URL) and may the LEGO force be with us! -Harvey (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | Re: IOLTC Update
|
| (...) My explanation? Blame Canada! <g,d&r> -John (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
| | | | Re: IOLTC Update
|
| John Neal wrote in message <3AA1CB7A.833172CD@u...st.net>... (...) assume (...) it. This is why (quoting from teh first message in this thread, by Mike Walsh): (...) This statement needs to be either stated to be wrong (please!) or explained (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
| | | | Re: What's that, under there???
|
| I think it's Brad, and he's signaling that the IOLTC should exclude Canada. >;^D (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |