Subject:
|
Re: New film
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 03:12:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
416 times
|
| |
|
|
Robert Thomas wrote:
> Ok here you go!!
>
> "JACKED"
>
> http://members.nbci.com/cryche/jacked.mpg
>
> It is 1:07 long and took me all day (didnt go to work)
Man, we really need a lugnet.movies group to discuss
these things...techniques, SFX, etc.
I think that the lighting quality was better/more even
in "The Brick" - which looked better blown up to full
screen size. I'm not sure what you did differently,
but I'd be interested to know (if you remember).
Not that "Jacked" isn't a great film - the movement you
have in both films is very fluid. I can see why they take
you all day!
J
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New film
|
| I agree Lugnet should start a movie/film group the difference is direct or indirect light. THE BRICK used direct light. I wanted the other to fell like he really didnt belong there Robert (...) (24 years ago, 16-Dec-00, to lugnet.town)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | New film
|
| Ok here you go!! "JACKED" (URL) is 1:07 long and took me all day (didnt go to work) I have a big project i am working on called "Hand of Fate" look for it around x-mas I am working on my web site as we speek. thats the hold up enjoy Robert Lego (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.town)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
