|
In lugnet.build.microscale, Ross Crawford wrote:
|
In lugnet.announce.moc, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
|
|
Nice! Would it look better with a 1x10 for the top & bottom beams instead of
1x4s?
|
For this length, I think it might look better with 1x10 plate for the top beam,
and dropping the 1x4 plates on the bottom completely, leaving the bridge deck to
form the bottom beam. - But then I wouldnt be able to reuse the design for a
longer bridge.
Ill give it a try.
Play well,
Jacob
--
Brakzand II
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread: ![Microscale truss bridge -Jacob Sparre Andersen (6-Oct-10 to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.town)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Microscale truss bridge -Ross Crawford (7-Oct-10 to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.town)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Microscale truss bridge -Jacob Sparre Andersen (18-Oct-10 to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.town)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Microscale truss bridge -Ross Crawford (19-Oct-10 to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.town)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|