| |
Oh sorry, I didn't know you were referring to that pieces. ;-)
Still, I'm a *bit* of a purist, and think that type of stuff is still wrong.
Mladen Pejic, over and out!
http://www3.sympatico.ca/mladenpejic/
In lugnet.technic.bionicle, Mark Sandlin writes:
> Mladen Pejic at mladenpejic@sympatico.ca wrote:
>
> > "useless throwbot arms"
> >
> > That's exactly what Dave was saying not to do. Why destroy a piece when you
> > can
> > work around it? I didn't have to chop off any pieces from my Bionicle
> > ball-joint arms; I incorporated them into the design. Isn't that the true
> > spirit of LEGO, otherwise wouldn't we start modifying ever piece that causes
> > us
> > frustration.
>
> I didn't chop up the regular ball-joint limbs, just the useless Throwbot
> Throwing arm (the one that fires the disc)
>
> If you know how to "work around" those, I'd sure like to see some ideas,
> because there's no studs or technic holes or nothin'.
>
> ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post
|
| (...) I didn't chop up the regular ball-joint limbs, just the useless Throwbot Throwing arm (the one that fires the disc) If you know how to "work around" those, I'd sure like to see some ideas, because there's no studs or technic holes or nothin'. (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
