 | | Re: promissed hovercraft ver02 —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | (...) Theroteically it should be feasible if you use a non-LEGO coating for a wing structure, such as thin paper. The problem is it needs to be streatched to carry the plane well. A LEGO glider could fly. Problem is how to get the structure light (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: promissed hovercraft ver02 —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | maybe is it going to be a new thread lego glider :) i suppose the structure can be enough light and strong but the problem is to make good profile of wings and propellor (because i'd like to build a plane) and of course the main issue is remote (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: promissed hovercraft ver02 —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Well you could start with something like this (URL) and go from there..... ROSCO (21 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: promissed hovercraft ver02 —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) One thing that could be done is a paraglider, that is a form of parachute with motor, propellor and controls hanging under it. Or a normal V-shaped glider. You need to look in the UL-range of "planes" though. What about a flying replica of the (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: promissed hovercraft ver02 —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | rosco you are right i've seen it before i'd like to see movies :) but thanx for reminding me this MOC tobbe don't press me too much... :) i've been talkin by myself that hovercraft isn't possible to build but now it is done... nothing is UL built (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
