Subject:
|
Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 17:12:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2577 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.general, Ronald Vallenduuk writes:
> As for the small construction vehicles: I'll get those in a flash as soon as
> they hit the shelves. Even if there's hardly any new parts in them for me, I
> think they're very well done: they're just cute. And Lego should be
> encouraged to make more of this....
Agreed! I think those little sets are cute too. The truck seems to have a
gear-driven dump mechanism, and the front end loader seems to have a
gear-driven front bucket lifting/lowering mechanism. Prices appear to be 20
USD for the dump truck and front end loader, and 6 USD for the little
forklift. Which is very reasonable for technic IMHO. I will definetly be
getting the 2 larger sets.
> Elsewhere I noticed two more RC cars: 8366 has a cool look and uses Silver
> Champ wheels. 8369 looks interesting on the parts side: new wheels/tyres,
> new shocks (as far as I know) and.......... new style body panels! Aargh!
> Not again!
http://www.marzdistribution.com/insideMarz/moreinfo.cfm?ID=LEGO-8366
probably uses the controller/receiver of the recent 8475 R/C buggy.
So it's a normal technic set (ie. modular design) with the new styling
panels, probably the new 8475 motors, and likely a servo output for the
steering.
http://www.marzdistribution.com/insideMarz/moreinfo.cfm?ID=LEGO-8369
appears to be in the same trend as the 5600 racer and the more recent
4589 racer (http://www.brickset.com/search.aspx?Query=4589). It's probably
a one-piece chassis with steering and drive inside. The wheels and
suspension look very similar to conventional radio control cars; which again
makes me think that's it's a one-piece chassis/wheels/suspension. But it's
strange that it's in the 8000 series, which is usually reserved for technic.
There are a few technic parts in the rear wing support structure. Strange....
Build well
John
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| A few observations about the new sets (now I've had the time to have a better look). First the fire truck. I've seen enough disaster movies to immediately recognize it as an airport firetruck. The color, oh well, maybe I'd prefer yellow or dayglow (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
44 Messages in This Thread: ![TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Ronald Vallenduuk (4-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Allan Bedford (4-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Larry Pieniazek (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Allan Bedford (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Larry Pieniazek (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Allan Bedford (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -John Guerquin (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Allan Bedford (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Technic is not dead!!! -John Guerquin (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Technic is not dead!!! -Allan Bedford (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Larry Pieniazek (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Allan Bedford (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Dean Hystad (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Allan Bedford (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Øyvind Steinnes (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Allan Bedford (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -William R. Ward (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Joseph Woolley (13-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Jonathan Wilson (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Tech not dead -Steven Lane (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -John Barnes (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Bob Gomez (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -John Barnes (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Rob Hendrix (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Ronald Vallenduuk (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Mark Neumann (5-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Paul Kleniewski (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Tobbe Arnesson (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Ross Crawford (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Kim Andersen (12-Feb-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Tobbe Arnesson (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Steven Lane (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Tobbe Arnesson (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Steven Lane (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Tobbe Arnesson (8-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Avi Parvin (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Paul Kleniewski (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -David Arnon (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Adrian Egli (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Øyvind Steinnes (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Jennifer Clark (8-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!! -Tobbe Arnesson (8-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![I still prefer the 8862 backhoe. Much better IMHO!! -Stéphane Simard (20-Jan-03 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|