|
In lugnet.loc.uk, Stuart Jones writes:
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Ross Crawford writes:
>
> > And for your next project, some mechanical interlocking on that signal box
> > would be *really* neat 8?)
>
> What, you mean like this?
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=19080
Yep, thats pretty much what I was thinkin' - nicely done!
> I'd need more flex parts to connect everything up and I don't want to modify
> the points yet, but the principle works. Trying to work out the locking just
> for 4 levers, I'm glad for once I don't have the parts to add any more
> points and signals! Clapham Junction anyone?!
8?) Or maybe New York subway...
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread: ![Working Signal Box and Signals -Stuart Jones (10-Jun-02 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Working Signal Box and Signals -Tony Priestman (10-Jun-02 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Working Signal Box and Signals -Ross Crawford (11-Jun-02 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Interlocking lever frame (was: Working Signal Box and Signals) -Stuart Jones (13-Jun-02 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|