 | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? —Steven Lane
|
| | | (...) The reason Bionicle and technic should not be in the same group is because thir is no cross-fertilisation between the two. Their is also an age gap between the two products. All that happens is that our respective posts get in each others way (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle folks went away? —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | | In lugnet.technic, Steven Lane writes: <quotes snipped> (...) I am here to tell you that your assumption is in error. I read the Technic posts (the ones that aren't screeds about devolution of parts and the like) and get much from them. (...) That's (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bionicle folks went away? —Steven Lane
|
| | | | | | | (...) Well I wasn't expecting 100% absolute conformality wth my word's. You must be the exception that prove's the rule. (...) Did you actually read my post. I've never trashed your right to enjoy Bionicle that's an assumption on your part. I don't (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bionicle folks went away? —Steven Lane
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.technic, Kyle Beatty writes: Kyle you expletive deleted, You set the FUT to bionicle, now everyone in Technic will miss my responce, and I'll be open to more tirade's from bloomin Bionicle's fans. Grrr My response for those using e-mail or (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bionicle folks went away? —Ray Kremer
|
| | | | | | (...) This is a complex argument to start with. For Lego the company, Bionicle has been very, very good. For the proliferation of Lego Technic sets that are big and fancy, perhaps Bionicle is bad. I could accept the argument that Lego will produce (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bionicle folks went away? —Steven Lane
|
| | | | | | (...) Ok I'll adjust my above statement to read Bionicle is bad for Lego Technic. (...) This whole argument reignited because of my one word retorical response to Tobbe's original post. (And it would be rude not to reply to reply's) (...) I wouldn't (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bionicle folks went away? —James Markham
|
| | | | | | (...) Just to add some more fuel to this, everybody HAS noticed that the 'Technic' logo is conspicuous by it's absence on the new Bionicle Bohrok and Bohrok-Va products and catalogues, haven't they? ;-) Maybe somebody DID take it up with Lego?!? (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bionicle folks went away? —Mark Koesel
|
| | | | | | The Technic Logo is conspiciously absent from _ALL_ 2002 "Technic" sets that we've seen boxes for thus far (Bionicle, Racers, Star Wars). I mentioned this in a past thread. IMHO, TLC will eventually phase out the Technic brand completely (just like (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bionicle folks went away? —Ron Sedlmeyer
|
| | | | | | (...) And a "Dark Age" will begin for many :< Ron (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away? —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) I'd have to say lugnet.build.mecha is the missing piece between technic and bionicle and quite frankly I find the Mechas utterly cool! I'm even building my own right now. But it's still a long way to bionicle and technic. Mecha seems to be in (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
