 | | Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Somehow I can't see opening a MIB copy of this just to get these parts. :-) Assuming you could find one. But if you found one that had damaged parts, using stuff from 9705 (or whichever it was) doesn't seem quite so bad. (23 years ago, 11-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) —Soh Chio Siong
|
| | | | (...) Well, Larry, you can say there's always some dumb fool who has done it. As a matter of fact, I did have a MIB 8680 Arctic Rescue Base set. It's the only thing I have that's got the early pneumatics. So I simply had to open up the box to see (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I would not call anyone a "dumb fool" because they decided to open a set and enjoy it... I was just saying I thought it was a bit ironic that this particular (technic holy grail??) set would be a source... Sets are to be enjoyed. I am gonna (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) —Soh Chio Siong
|
| | | | | (...) Of course not. I was only saying of myself in jest. (...) Certainly, sets are to be enjoyed whichever you like. (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: FT vs LEGO pneumatics (was: extensions from hitechnicstuff) —Klaas H. Meijaard
|
| | | | Should anyone be interested: I have 5 of these long cylinders as a spare... they may go! And a perfect condition spare 8680+instr, no box. Will soon appear in my BB-shop, if not traded/sold earlier..... Klaas H. Meijaard - Netherlands Lugnet 291 (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
