| |
In lugnet.technic, Simon Bennett writes:
> Absolutely. I agree with Jason, that this chap can't have ever seen Technic
> and certainly not Dacta.
>
> I'm going to post a draft reply letter and the URL's of some pics to back up
> our case.
I think that would be great!!!
Like I said, if you can dig out that reference to the fellow from MIT (I
think his first name is Fred) and his work on idioms, that would make it
even better... I am so bumming that I can't find it. It's not on the technic
front page and it's not in this list either:
http://www.lugnet.com/links/
but it's awesome. Help??? Anyone remember what I am talking about?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter
|
| (...) I sit firmly in the 'sort of don't' camp. I'm going to do a little more work on this tonight, particularly in terms of the ways in which Meccano models civils better than Lego (in my opinion none). (...) One of the reasons why I never liked (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
