| |
In lugnet.loc.uk, Simon Bennett writes:
> In lugnet.loc.uk, George Haberberger writes:
> > Reading your letter, I think you should send it, my remarks are better
> > suited for an undergraduate class, or perhaps a high level high school class.
> >
> > I don't have any Civil Engineering background (other than that which would
> > have been common to my degree) but I'm still not totally sold on bricks for
> > modeling construction. Techniq would work very well for kids for modelling
> > mechanics, and the gears should work very well, too.
>
> I have now sent the letter. I didn't change it that much and it's still
> very long but I wanted to get it out there before I got cold feet about
> sending it at all!
>
> The text was:
[text snipped]
> I hope that it reflects most people's comments and you are all happy with it.
Well, I didn't comment yet in this thread, because I'm not an engineer or a
teacher (though I did start in engineering at uni), and I hadn't really thought
much about it. I did have one small Meccano set when I was a kid, but it didn't
take me long to lose all those darn nuts & bolts, so I never really did
anything with it.
But having read your letter, I think it does a pretty good comparison. I
wonder, though how "juniorisation" is going to affect that comparison, and what
(if anything) Meccano is planning in the way of new directions? Best keep on
your toes, TLC!!!
(Oh, and it's pretty cool to get a mention in such an auspicious letter,
thanks!)
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
