 | | Re: Uh, anyone else notice the 8466 at S@H now?
|
|
"K" == Krusty <surfside_guy@nospam...tmail.com> writes: K> smaller one looks like it might be fun, with the wench on the K> front, What? A wench on the front? Would that be the first female technifig? *grin* K> They look cool, no? They sure do. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Uh, anyone else notice the 8466 at S@H now?
|
|
(...) I wish they would make a female technic figure I could put in my diggers, trucks and so on! However, it would only be any good if she was a real woman technic figure in a boiler suit or something else appropriate, none of this lipstick wearing (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Uh, anyone else notice the 8466 at S@H now?
|
|
Would this be what you have in mind? (URL) here: (URL) click 'bits and pieces' to get the regular, framed version) Duq "Jennifer Clark" <jen@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk> wrote in message news:3B31DC9E.97BDA7...h.ac.uk... (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Uh, anyone else notice the 8466 at S@H now?
|
|
(...) After you've changed the head Jennifer you'll have to name your figure 'Twiggy' :-). Steve (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Uh, anyone else notice the 8466 at S@H now?
|
|
(...) Getting there but not quite, still too much of an "action babe" - I had more in mind a Vasquez from Aliens type but in a construction scenario ;-) Jennifer (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
