 | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —Tony Priestman
|
| | | On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Jennifer Clark (<3AE83CC5.1C8501F1@...e.dmem.str ath.ac.uk>) wrote at 15:20:37 (...) But only a creative use of a bad part. If they didn't make so many bad pieces that they can *only* find 'creative' uses for, the sets would (...) (23 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —Jennifer Clark
|
| | | | (...) I have wondered about this occasionally, as admittedly I have yet to find any use for these parts in my own creations, but I most often end up thinking it is due to my mindset being locked in the "old ways" rather than the parts being (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jennifer Clark (<3AED4F3D.37EA4C7D@...e.dmem.str ath.ac.uk>) wrote at 11:40:45 (...) Ahh, but traditionally, the old ways are the best ways ;-) From a psychological point of view, it's probably easier to imagine that a uniform (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —Steve Lane
|
| | | | (...) I have to diasagree the part that lets you join connectors or axles at right angles has opened new dimensions for me in compact suspension design. (...) I've used that analogy myself several times :-). Steve The part in question is the 6536 (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
