 | | Re: Gear train friction?
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:m3k89e4iva.fsf@...ldomain... (...) The difference is, when the bush is rubbing against the beam, it's a much greater surface area than when the axle-end rubs the end-stop. ROSCO (25 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Strange anomalies in 8460 and 8868...
|
|
I don't have these sets, but I found something similar in the 8002 Destroyer droid. It came with an amendment sheet for page 30, showing a different position for the two rubber bands. Now the photo on page 31 shows yet another position for them.... (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Gear train friction?
|
|
(...) The length of one axle is normally slightly shorter than a corresponding beam, ie. an axle #4 is slightly shorter than a 4 stud beam. So this is probably why you achieve some slack when putting bricks on either side of the axle to support it. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Section Telescopic Crane Boom
|
|
(...) Excellent stuff - I was hoping you had something different in mind :-) Jennifer Clark (25 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8457 Power Puller
|
|
Chain:- 81 links (i think) Motor:- 9v same as mindstorms. Flex System? I like this set, almost tempted to get a 2nd set to get another motor and big set of wheels.. -- Jason King LugNet #665 Jose Antonio Vacas <joseavm@meta4.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
