|
|
 | | Re: 8275 Bulldozer...
|
| (...) By starter set in this context I mean a set that contains enough of the parts to be really useful in building MOCs rather than a "first" set or the like. 4 motors are better than 2 motors in this context, but the dino looks interesting too. (...) (17 years ago, 15-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: 8275 Bulldozer...
|
| (...) It's available at S@H now, for 250AUD... (17 years ago, 14-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: 8275 Bulldozer...
|
| (...) I'm with John on this one - I ended up grabbing the Dino because it was cheaper, and I could at least get experience with the new motors and control system (which I *think* I like... it's been hard to experiment a lot since my kids won't let (...) (17 years ago, 14-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: 8275 Bulldozer...
|
| (...) Wow, you call a $150 USD set a "starter" set???!!! I think I want your LEGO budget! ;) All kidding aside, like ROSCO said, if you want to get into the new motors & RC units, I think the dino is a better intro set, but there do seem to be lots (...) (17 years ago, 14-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Two New GBC Modules..
|
| (...) It's hard to tell from that picture, but pause the video and you'll see the balls run up at a 6-stud spacing. That means the peaks of the wave are six studs apart. The cams are spaced with one pulley plus a half bush, so are spaced exactly one (...) (17 years ago, 14-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
|
