 | | SSC (was Re: Best pneumatic hexapod yet!) —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | (...) Will it be necessary to switch anything at a specific time? For example, if SSC is walking forward, and it takes 3/4 of a step, then levers are flipped to make it turn (which would be reversing the legs on one side), to complete the "current" (...) (19 years ago, 1-Aug-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: SSC (was Re: Best pneumatic hexapod yet!) —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) No. The central timer is unchanged by switching from forward to reverse, or walk to turn. The things that do change behavior are the leg sweep pistons. These will do their best to accommidate the change, which may not have any affect until the (...) (19 years ago, 1-Aug-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: SSC (was Re: Best pneumatic hexapod yet!) —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | (...) I should say it would look more 'natural'. How easy will it be to install a normally closed (while the foot is in the air) touch sensor in the foot? Will the feet be required to do much rotating and/or sliding while taking a step? (I assume it (...) (19 years ago, 1-Aug-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: SSC (was Re: Best pneumatic hexapod yet!) —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) Given that I have not designed the feet yet, I don't know. (...) I have not finished the feet, but I was planning on providing an ankle that rotates about the Y axis, so that foot rotation is limited. A certain amount of sliding is expected. (...) (19 years ago, 1-Aug-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: SSC (was Re: Best pneumatic hexapod yet!) —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | (...) Your walking stuff is always very popular, as it is. Don't worry, I'm not pushing for anything. I already have about five other projects that need to be completed in the next ELEVEN days... Steve (19 years ago, 1-Aug-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
