| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Rob Antonishen wrote:
> > Are those the RC Motors tucked in there somewhere?
> >
> > If so, which axel hole are you driving it with?
> > >
> > > http://sparky.i989.net/legop4.htm
> > >
> > > Anyway, it was fun--I'll bring it to the hobby show
> > >
> > > Dave K
>
>
> Once agian I made the mistake of using hte 'higher speed' one, just like the
> last robot event.
>
> IN the 8448 that was just fine, but these are bigger tyres and a heavier
> chassis, so it takes a little bit to get up to speed.
>
> You can barely see' em, but in the 'underside' shot, you can see the RC motors
> at hte back.
So which hole did you use when you RC'd your 8466?
I still couldn't totally duplicate your setup with mine built with the main
chassis...
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=50246
... because the RC motor won't clear some other parts of the car.
(Not that it worked that well either)
Keith
Keith
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 8865 and 8475
|
| (...) I used the bottom 'slower' one for the 8466 (...) I did this mod a long time ago, but from what I remember, I got rid of the dark grey liftarms and pointed the motors towards the front. I can't remember what other modifications I had to do to (...) (20 years ago, 31-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 8865 and 8475
|
| (...) Once agian I made the mistake of using hte 'higher speed' one, just like the last robot event. IN the 8448 that was just fine, but these are bigger tyres and a heavier chassis, so it takes a little bit to get up to speed. You can barely see' (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.technic)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
