 | | Re: pneumatic cylinder: why not hydraulic ??
|
|
purpledave@maskofdestiny.com (Purple Dave) wrote in <HvrHn0.Cpw@lugnet.com>: (...) I'd add 7. if you used hydraulics, a cylinder would extend or retract fully with one stroke of the pump. The resistance the cylinder encounters is transmitted to the (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: pneumatic cylinder: why not hydraulic ??
|
|
(...) Not necessarily. Assuming both cylinders are the same size, a full pump cylinder stroke will only result in a full working cylinder stroke if the working cylinder doesn't have significantly more resistance than the pump cylinder. If the (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: pneumatic cylinder: why not hydraulic ??
|
|
purpledave@maskofdestiny.com (Purple Dave) wrote in <Hvtrvs.sBv@lugnet.com>: (...) And where would you leave all that fluid? Fluids aren't compressible (yeah, they are, but so much less than air that I'm close enough for government work). (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: pneumatic cylinder: why not hydraulic ??
|
|
(...) It is my understanding that fliuds cannot be compressed. So a cylinder hooked to another cylinder with fluid in between (assuming no leaks), would always provide 1 to 1 movement. I'm not an expert in hydraulics, but I think your claim above (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: pneumatic cylinder: why not hydraulic ??
|
|
(...) The amount that a fluid can be compressed varies with the fluid, the temperature, the pressure and other things. Water can be compressed too much - that's why trucks don't use it for their hydraulic systems. Hydraulic fluid is special oil that (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
