Subject:
|
Re: Crane
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 19:25:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2059 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Luis Hernández wrote:
| |
In lugnet.technic, Erik Bush wrote:
| |
Thanks! Here is a boom idea that I have been thinking about for a while...
|
Mmmm... i’m not exactly the expert in cranes (in fact, I’ve never built one),
but I think you can use 2x4 plates instead of the 1x4 plates (this way you
can get a solid boom instead of a parallelogram).. like this:
Luis 
(comments, instructions, death threats, etc. please remove all the X’s)
|
I have tried it and that is a good idea, but it adds some extra weight>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Crane
|
| (...) Yes it does, but without the 2x4s, your boom will be able to shear - ie the parallelogram created by the beams & 1x4 plates only has friction holding it square, and a long boom built that way may fail. If the 1x4s are on the top/bottom it (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Crane
|
| (...) Mmmm... i'm not exactly the expert in cranes (in fact, I've never built one), but I think you can use 2x4 plates instead of the 1x4 plates (this way you can get a solid boom instead of a parallelogram).. like this: (URL) (...) Luis (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
