 | | Re: New MOC: Backhoe fully Remote Controlled
|
|
(...) I guess you don't get a bonus point for 100% Lego remote control 8?( Great model. I like the stabilisers, too. It's funny looking at the progress shots with all those wires & hoses looking like spaghetti, then all neat & tidy in the final (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: Backhoe fully Remote Controlled
|
|
(...) Thanks! (...) I'm sure you'll beat me - this is my first MOC that is supposed to look like something although it's not a scale model. (...) I would not know anything about 24 - until June :) (...) I intend to :) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: Backhoe fully Remote Controlled
|
|
Looks great! seems to me that my drillrig has got something to live upto! And I dont feel THAT much older, I feel 24 are somehow just the right age! Keep up the good work! regards "Tobbe Arnesson" <tnt@arnesson.nu> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | New MOC: Backhoe fully Remote Controlled
|
|
FUT: lugnet.technic Hi all! I've finished my new MOC; A backhoe digger. Some quick facts: Weight: Approx. ~4kg (8.818lb) Total length (including blade and backhoe {folded}): ~79cm (31.102") Height cab roof -> ground: ~27cm (10.630") Width: 24cm (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Thank God my clock works!
|
|
Hi This is a .mpd of the spaceing I used in my 84t escapement. (URL) abain to Tore Ericksson for authoring x744.dat Regards Chris (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Spectrum as source of Technic Spares
|
|
According to their customer service, they are not allowed to sell Lego in the USA. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Fusion" <mikefusion@hotmail.com> To: <lugnet.technic@lugnet.com>; <lugnet.robotics.rcx...ugnet.com> Sent: Friday, March 15, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Slizer & Throwbot: Why the 2 names?
|
|
It does seem like the spent unessacary time and efort to differentiate the two (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic.slizer, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: How much can you shrink a dual differential drive?
|
|
(...) Thanks a lot, Rosco. I think I'm going to go with Stefano Prosseda's variation, which you also mention on your webpage (URL) clearly didn't quite understand the concept and now see how my design had way too many gears only to accomplish (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
This thread got me thinking. As you may or may not know, my site is called 'LEGO on my Mind'. (URL) visual motto of this site has always been a picture of a man with bricks for brains. After it had been around a couple of years, another site (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How much can you shrink a dual differential drive?
|
|
(...) snip (...) Here's yet another shrunken dual differential design. It uses worm gears to drive both differential housings as a space saving measure. This also the adds the feature (?) of a bit more gear reduction. There's a few pics of the (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: One year major update
|
|
forgot to mention, but please try my sitemap!! Its working the way I wanted to! HTML are such a fun when its works! "jan-tore" <jan-tore@legotrucks.com> wrote in message news:Gt8wpM.M7v@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How much can you shrink a dual differential drive?
|
|
(...) Excellent color coding in your pics. Regrettably, I have no practical advice. When I built the differential drive in Dave Baum's book, I was dumbfounded by the principle. I look forward to to seeing what is clearly a demanding project. - Kyle (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | One year major update
|
|
Let me know what you all think! Also I have added a survey, maybe to see if its possible to make alittle "voice" to TLC, and see if this voice can change things, who knows? anyway, keep on surfing jt www.legotrucks.com (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How much can you shrink a dual differential drive?
|
|
(...) Well, I think several people have delved into this, but here's my contribution (URL) It doesn't solve the "dual speed" problem, but it's fairly small, and can be reduced further. ROSCO (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | How much can you shrink a dual differential drive?
|
|
Hi all, I've got an intriguing little MOC coming up that hopefully will interest both the technicheads and the robogeeks. It is a tracked vehicle with a twist, but you'll have to wait to learn all the details ;-) In the meantime, here is something I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Need Instruction Scans - Trike Buggy (set 1257 or 3000)
|
|
Thanks! Looks like another LEGO onlnie resource I'm gonna bookmark and visit serveral times. :) (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How real should it be?
|
|
(...) I think we need to remember the original Lego sets that contained these parts. The motors and pneumatics were designed for, and worked well with, the relatively small models built from the Lego instructions. I don't think the Lego designers (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
Do what you can. I think, however, that making one the same size, to fit in the same package, using parts that you approve of as "real technic" is not only possible, but would be a good way to show LEGO how it "should have been". --Jack Gregory (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
<<snip>> (...) In the same scale or can I upsize things a bit? /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: SSPP power suggestion...
|
|
(...) Okay, I see I have to work on this fraise a little: The model must be able to pull the weight for at least 10 cm (3.937 inches). (...) Heh :) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
