 | | Re: One year major update
|
|
forgot to mention, but please try my sitemap!! Its working the way I wanted to! HTML are such a fun when its works! "jan-tore" <jan-tore@legotrucks.com> wrote in message news:Gt8wpM.M7v@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How much can you shrink a dual differential drive?
|
|
(...) Excellent color coding in your pics. Regrettably, I have no practical advice. When I built the differential drive in Dave Baum's book, I was dumbfounded by the principle. I look forward to to seeing what is clearly a demanding project. - Kyle (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | One year major update
|
|
Let me know what you all think! Also I have added a survey, maybe to see if its possible to make alittle "voice" to TLC, and see if this voice can change things, who knows? anyway, keep on surfing jt www.legotrucks.com (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How much can you shrink a dual differential drive?
|
|
(...) Well, I think several people have delved into this, but here's my contribution (URL) It doesn't solve the "dual speed" problem, but it's fairly small, and can be reduced further. ROSCO (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | How much can you shrink a dual differential drive?
|
|
Hi all, I've got an intriguing little MOC coming up that hopefully will interest both the technicheads and the robogeeks. It is a tracked vehicle with a twist, but you'll have to wait to learn all the details ;-) In the meantime, here is something I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Need Instruction Scans - Trike Buggy (set 1257 or 3000)
|
|
Thanks! Looks like another LEGO onlnie resource I'm gonna bookmark and visit serveral times. :) (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How real should it be?
|
|
(...) I think we need to remember the original Lego sets that contained these parts. The motors and pneumatics were designed for, and worked well with, the relatively small models built from the Lego instructions. I don't think the Lego designers (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
Do what you can. I think, however, that making one the same size, to fit in the same package, using parts that you approve of as "real technic" is not only possible, but would be a good way to show LEGO how it "should have been". --Jack Gregory (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
<<snip>> (...) In the same scale or can I upsize things a bit? /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: SSPP power suggestion...
|
|
(...) Okay, I see I have to work on this fraise a little: The model must be able to pull the weight for at least 10 cm (3.937 inches). (...) Heh :) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
