To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / *8776 (-10)
  Re: Too much crane?
 
(...) NO! Never! (...) one has certainly exceeded your previous works. (...) I'm really looking forward to seeing the inner details of your crane. I know we're all going to ooh and ahh over your intricate and clever mechanical mechanisms, especially (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
 
(...) And (...) No, I'm not (IMO). (...) No, they are names, one letter of which stands for LEGO. They do not contain the word LEGO. Why else do you think LEGO leaves them alone, while asking the developers to rename legOS? ROSCO FUT: .o-t.debate (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  fairness to tim
 
in all fairness to tim, there's nothing WRONG about his opinion.... and Tobbe is gracious to change his motm name (another lugnetter uses MotMoment) so, no harm, no foul. -paul (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
 
(...) And re-reading this, it could be interpreted that I thought Paul was being destructive. That's not what I meant. I meant to exempt him from that and say that I felt his comments were constructive. Doh! -Tim (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
 
(...) Did I use the word 'trademark' once? (...) Look at the context of their use of the words as I explained in my last post. (...) This comment has nothing constructive in it, it is only childish and spiteful. I have attempted to steer this (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
 
(...) For the record, I agree with the word ownership sentiment. I did not at any point in time imply a word ownership in any legal sense. I simply made a polite request of someone and explained why I was making that reqest. Tobbe happened to accept (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
 
A few others to add to the list: ToadAuto.com MOTM: (URL) Model Building Mania MOTM: (URL) Car List Best MOTM: (URL) Model of the Month: (URL) Hobby Model of the Month Club: (URL) there is Joe Lauher's Construction Toy Homepage which has a MOTM (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Too much crane?
 
(...) Uhhh...hhh....... As usual with your models, I thought the first shot was the actual crane, until I clicked on it to see the close-up details. And it's radio-controlled too???? Yikes. Excellent work, as always... --Bill. (I added (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
 
  Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
 
(...) Larry may not be sure what it implies but I think I know what it implies to me... To me it implies that anyone trying to trademark a name as generic as "Model of the Month" is being silly at best. What if Fashion Magazine decided to start a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
 
(...) FWIW, Model Railroader(tm) had a "Model of the Month" for many years, may still do for all I know (I'm no longer a subscriber). Not sure what that implies, just thought I'd throw it out as a perhaps useful bit of info. (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR