 | | Re: Set 8011: Jango Fett & more
|
|
(...) Guesses: 1) Pre-release/prototype 2) Glued together for the show 3) Glued to a backing of some sort, probably for ease of standing, pulled off for the photo Matt (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Set 8011: Jango Fett & more
|
|
(...) Hey, I looked at this photo: (URL) What's wrong with that super battle droid's legs? It looks like some very bad manufacture! LFB (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf gallery for Jump-O-Bot
|
|
You should mirror your site at (URL) want Lego content and have no limits or advertising at this time. -- Bob Fay THE SHOP (URL) Agullo" <technicpuppy@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GrFzHH.Gzt@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Brickshelf gallery for Jump-O-Bot
|
|
If the Geocities site is down, please take a look at (URL) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Introducing Jump-O-Bot
|
|
Dear all, One of the unsolved challenges posed by the authors of the very fine "Building Robots with Lego Mindstorms" is to construct a robot that propels itself jumping, rather than walking on legs or rolling on wheels. Neither pretty nor smart, (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Set 8011: Jango Fett & more
|
|
(...) (answering my own question, posting for everyones benefit): Here's a pic that I just found: (URL) at the bottom of this page: (URL) see better pictures of 8011 as well as 8012 (super battle droid). I was disappointed to see that the new (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Teaser 02
|
|
Onua: I got this from a nuhvok memory chip. There was a pile of 16 destroyed. Not just shut down but ripped to shreds and put in piles. The Krana were broken into pieces also. Whenua: I'll send it to Vakama and get his opinion. He should know what (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: I didn't know this part existed (was Re: 8009 R2D2)
|
|
Or turquoise (yes, they do exist) :) "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:GrE9y9.DB1@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Review of Darth Vader, set 8010
|
|
A nice looking set at a medium price. check it out: (URL) BASICS: Set No.: 8010 Set Name: Darth Vader Theme: Star Wars (Technic) Price: $40 USD (pre-tax, at Target) Pieces: 408 (my count- includes all extras) THE GOOD: Very few specialized pieces. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: LoTek siteupdate
|
|
(...) Houston, you have a problem :þ (...) I'm working on it, I'm working on it :) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
