 | | Re: Pneumatically driven locomotive ??
|
|
(...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re:Re: Pneumatically driven locomotive ??
|
|
(...) Joe Nagata built a "Air Engine Car": (URL) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LoTek, a new Technic homepage with some new MOC's!
|
|
Snyggt jobbat, Det är det enda jag kan säga Snygg, stilren. Fortsätt i den här stilen /Martin "Tobbe Arnesson" <tnt@arnesson.nu> wrote in message news:3ae9c2b0.466601...net.com... (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatically driven locomotive ??
|
|
I know someone built a pneumatically driven car... Anyone in lugnet.technic remember who it was/where the pics are? Duq (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | LoTek, a new Technic homepage with some new MOC's!
|
|
<< followups to lugnet.technic >> Hi! After much work and frustration I have finally finished my homepage enough to publish it OnLine and tell you folks it exists! So, rush over there and enjoy. Among the new projects I can recommend my Hercules in (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Jennifer Clark (<3AE83CC5.1C8501F1@...e.dmem.str ath.ac.uk>) wrote at 15:20:37 (...) But only a creative use of a bad part. If they didn't make so many bad pieces that they can *only* find 'creative' uses for, the sets would (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
"Jennifer Clark" <jen@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk> wrote (...) I am the only one here who didn't like this model? I picked it up < half price but still rate it as one of my least fave sets (well, out of the ones I own anyway). Only really good points (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Yeah. For how good a set that is I'm surprised it was a Shop at Home exclusive, therefore relegating it to "lesser-known" status. (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Agreed! I think that this was the only 1999 set that could stand up to some of the sets from previous years...it has a lot of functionality integrated into a relatively small unit. And yeah, it is a very good example of the fact that high (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have a REALLY GOOD photo of the the 8466
|
|
(...) I've also been trying to look for some large pictures of this model but have not had any luck. I have seen one picture of it but it is pretty small (384x288). From the little that I've seen and heard of it though, it looks like a stunning set (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
