 | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Agreed. The majority of these elements aren't primarily structural elements, and to sell us models constructed entirely out of them is extremely irritating. (...) I've honestly never used them for anything, but I've seen some interesting (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
To All, The parts that were listed, some are useful, some are not, depending on the person (Which is a huge part of LEGO anyway), I would like to see some old sets come out again or at least some new sets using those design criteria, complicated (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
Bah! I wish LEGO would just release the 8880 SuperCar and the SpaceShuttle for 2001. hell, just release the parts in a BAG, with no instructions. (online only) R & D for new design ....... $0.00 Packaging ......... $0.05 I bet they would the BEST (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) The projectiles make great legs for multi-legged robots. The rubber tip offers optimal grip on all sorts of surfaces. (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) I honestly agree-- they've mostly got their uses, although I do agree further that making sets SOLELY out of these pieces is kinda annoying-- too many of these pieces can get on your nerves... (...) don't need more than, say, 2, although I (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
