|
|
 | | Re: Studless Technic models
|
| Hello everybody, (...) True. But then, I have enough studded beams to build whichever way I want. Therefore I welcome the addition of other types of parts to my collection. In fact, LEGO has to come up with new cool parts in new cool models to make (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Purpose of part 32072
|
| Hello everybody, Others have already elaborated on the advantages of this part, so let me just add a picture taken from the 8455 alternate model for those of you who haven't seen the part in its original application yet: (URL) The primary 8455 (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Part colors?
|
| Hello everybody, (...) Moreover, some of these blue parts ARE visible on the alternate model: (URL) And IMO they would look better in black or grey, respectively ... Greetings Horst (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Studless Technic models
|
| (...) I'm usually more of a lurker here nowadays, but when this topic came up (again), I had to add my 2 cents. Allan, I couldn't agree with you more. Technic is supposed to be more complicated than other lines. To me complicated = more challenging, (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Studless Technic models
|
| (...) Jindrich, I also understand both sides of the argument. I see uses for both types of pieces, so I'm not hard core in either direction. (...) Also, I hope you understood my question about what it was you were concerned about. I just wanted to (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
