|
|
 | | Re: baby walker
|
| (...) Thanks, I'll be trying it out soon myself. I figured that if it lifted its foot off the ground, it would more easily be considered a walker. I hope you have fun watching it stomp around :). -jrl P.S. Are you planning on taking any pics? (21 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: baby walker
|
| (...) Actually no, the double bent liftarm has no point where it balances perfectly. (...) yes, (URL) (but I've none yet!) (...) Sure you can !!! (...) Yes it works, but to rise the foot completely you have to add the bottom motor part. I had a (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: baby walker
|
| it works well with part x 265 peeron: (URL) Gjerløw Jørgensen" <lgjPURGE@jyde.dk> wrote in message news:Xns935471471AE2....63.236... (...) on (...) pulley (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: baby walker
|
| (...) The micro motor's ring will acutally fit on more than that. I have sucessfully used it with a "gear 16 tooth with clutch": (URL) well as directly on to the bottom of a brick, or in one of the holes of a beam. (21 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: baby walker
|
| (...) I was just thinking about the design and that I would really like to have it lift its foot off the ground, and I think I have something. I think that a 1x7 liftarm with an 18 long flex tube would be a touch smaller and allow the foot to clear (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
