 | | Re: baby walker
|
|
(...) Very cool! Thanks for trying out the design for me, I would have worked on it myself, but I'm glad you could help me out. I'm wondering, did the design with 7 pieces get its foot totally off the ground? I think lego is actually making a (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Power Pulling
|
|
(...) Thanks for the clarification. I'd love to see the new vehicle when completed, and how much it pulls. MM (21 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Town scale Road Train with steering trailers
|
|
(...) mechanism (...) What I built is better than a convetional B double or triple. A B double or triple still cuts corners, but not as mush as a dolly setup. A B double or triple just eliminates a joint. I quiclky built a B double to make sure I (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Diet Walker Light
|
|
here is the light version of the Diet Walker. Its feet could be improved, but he manages to get around. (URL) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: yet another teensy walker
|
|
this rules. its totally kewl how you gave it four legs. i was planning on doing a four legger today sometime. one thing though. i see that he legs move in parallel. is there anyway that you can make all four hit the ground a different moments, so (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Town scale Road Train with steering trailers
|
|
(...) Theirs nothing wrong with this system, although you seem to have added complexiy where none is needed. I think what you have tried to create is a "B triple". This is 1 normal trailer following two other trailers that have their own fifth wheel (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: yet another teensy walker
|
|
"Rob Stehlik" <robbby31@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HCuM8H.11s5@lugnet.com... (...) I should have known you would come up with something special. That is the first time I've seen that conical gear used on the micromotor. Very cool! -- Bob (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: baby walker
|
|
after watching that film, i got to say that this is fun but its totally not a walker. first foremost for that leg drag, I'd rename this Igor or somthing. -tk "Philippe Hurbain" <philohome@free.fr> wrote in message news:HCvtts.nF@lugnet.com... (...) (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: baby walker
|
|
I got into a big debate at the bar last night as to whether this is a walker or not. Believe me, by the end I found myself arguing for this bot's place as a walker. but that was last night and I had too much to drink. this bot deserves to be in a (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: baby walker
|
|
...and then they were five... The 1x7 liftarm is a bit short and the motor bumps against the flexible axle. So I used a 1x9 (7+2) to be low enough, and I could remove Micromotor bottom. I used a 1x2 liftarm with plate only for aestetical reasons... (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
