|
|
 | | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
| "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:H9IqBA.99@lugnet.com... (...) hi it's a little summary of us :))) BEGIN Filled in form (edit his part) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...-+-+-+-+-+ Name: lugnet .technic member Nickname: AFOL Age: (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: new 2003 sets
|
| (...) Actually, in my opinion, if the set were named Columbia, it would be a bigger seller, as it would now be a souvenir, or memorabilia for this recent tragic event. Sales-wise I'd call it unlucky. Just my $0.02 worth. Play well. Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
| | | | | Re: new 2003 sets
|
| (...) I love the age posted on the helicopter box (4403). 0-99!!!! Yay! Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: new 2003 sets
|
| "TJ Avery" <tjavery@texbrick.com> wrote in message news:H9qHFq.JFL@lugnet.com... (...) Now THAT'S what I've been waiting to see :-) I figured Technic was not completely dead; just seeing what is in the 2003 Pitsco gave me some assurance. But that (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
| | | | | Re: new 2003 sets
|
| This stuff is great!! I remember about three years ago, Lego said it would be about three years before they could begin emerging from the Junior Age. I've been waiting patiently for this to actually occur and am pleased that they stuck to their (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
