|
|
 | | Re: 8472 - a quick look
|
| I just saw this listed at US S@H. You're right, the parts look really nice, the price doesn't. I sure hope we see some of these parts showing up in partspacks or cheaper sets soon. I know I'd LOVE to get a bunch of those trans-red bent beams to (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Has anyone found...?
|
| I'm just looking for something a little less vulneralble to failing under accidental stress (i.e. - binding of parts), and at the same time use that same feature to be able to support much more weight as could regular chain links (not conveyor (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Has anyone found...?
|
| (...) Assuming you actually mean chain and not track links then I have two idea's. You could double up the chain, using two side by side. Or Theoretically if you used larger gears the chain would (apart from being slightly longer) move faster, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Has anyone found...?
|
| A heavier duty chain that would work in the place of the current chain links Lego manufactures? -Rob (23 years ago, 18-Sep-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Best all time Technic sets poll
|
| <<snip>> Since my Lugnet membership is in limbo awaiting fee I'll answer this way. The only two sets I can have an honest opinion about are these: 1 <set:8480 8480 Space Shuttle> 2 <set:8460 8460 Mobile Crane> Regards, /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
