|
|
 | | Re: Best Technic set poll
|
| What do you mean, not meant to be rolled onto hard surfaces? I only got it to work on a hard floor. It never opened on a carpet... Duq Oh, by the way, keep it on the shortlist, I do think it's a classic. "Adrian Egli" <aegli@san.rr.com> wrote in (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: 8475
|
| Wow, thanks for the pics. I am absolutely _shocked_ at how much smaller the 8475 rims and wheels are. I thought they were maybe 2/3 to 3/4 the size of the 8466/8458 equivalents. I was totally fooled -- they are barely half the size. Impressive that (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: 8475
|
| (...) I put some info here a while back; (URL) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: 8475
|
| Many thanks to John Morgan for putting the pictures up. My question (to John Heins or anyone who can answer) is based on looking at those images. "John Heins" <Johnmhiii@aol.com> wrote in message news:H0rK02.99z@lugnet.com... (...) points (...) Has (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: 8475
|
| In lugnet.technic, John Morgan writes: sorry about that ... didnt know how to create direct links to the images... (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
