Subject:
|
Re: Storing bricks at low temperatures
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.storage
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 01:56:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2483 times
|
| |
|
|
I know that Tony has paid big bucks for a lot of the Lego he has now. But in
all seriousness, Tony, if you need additional storage space, my home in New
York is always available. Just ship all of your Castle and Pirate sets to me
across the small pond called Atlantic and I can keep your Lego cozy and warm.
It won't cost you any storage fees, just don't expect to get it back too
soon......
This suggestion does not always go far. Just yesterday I tried this one on
Richard Parsons in Oz and he turned me down like I expect you will. I can't
figure out why people don't want to safely store their Lego with me at no
charge to the sender.....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Salm
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Tony Priestman writes:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Huw Millington (<FnxHzs.Mwr@lugnet.com>) wrote at
> 19:21:29
>
> >
> > Tony Priestman <Tony@you-rang.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:05FilHAIQLd4EwF2@you-rang.demon.co.uk...
> > >
> > > One of my concerns is that it's not heated, so it probably drops to
> > > around freezing in winter. Is this likely to be a problem?
> >
> > Theft is more likely to be a problem than low temperature, I would have
> > thought.
>
> That's the other of my concerns :-)
> >
> > You'll just have to get rid of the spare bed and the unused bathroom suite
> > :-)
>
> Hmmm. The bed is doable. The bathroom would require a commitment to stay
> here for a long time, or lose quite a bit on the value of the house.
> Hmmm. I could be tempted, though.
>
> Actually, if I have to move, I might consider a large shed.
>
> "Every man has a shed within him" :-)
>
> --
> Tony Priestman
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
