Subject:
|
Re: the not-so-incredible BOX-4-BLOX™
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.storage
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:14:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6418 times
|
| |
|
|
> Finally, there's the flexibility of the whole system. I'd be equally happy
> with fewer box parts and more grids. If I could snap in the desired grid to
> a frame, and pour the elements through to do a binary sort, that would be
> great. If grids and frames were available separately, I could spend more and
> add more levels to the sort if I desired. Doubtless, it would add to the
> cost to be able to snap in different grid meshes, but I'd happily trade more
> grids for fewer boxes (and for the lid, which I see no use for).
I think the point is that once you have finished playing you stick all your
lego in and then sort it. You then leave it in the boxes for next time, thus
needing a lid
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | the not-so-incredible BOX-4-BLOX™
|
| In lugnet.general, Matthew Gerber writes: ... (...) ... (...) ... Sometimes I buy time-savers that are so clever that I cannot dream of a way to improve on them. While Box-4-Blox is useful, and I use mine every time I part something out, it's far (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.storage)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
