 | | Re: Loose or Clumps?
|
|
(...) snip... The upside to stacking is that it not only looks neater and takes up less space, but it allows you to quickly inventory what you have and retrieve certain pieces when you're building. The downside is that I've found small cracks in (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.storage)
|
| |
| | Re: The ULITMATE LEGO Storage containers from Israel!!!!
|
|
(...) The company's website is www.zag.co.il but there is no useful supplier data therein. They have lots of different storage products. Paul Sinasohn Acappella Bass and Technical Trainer just starting with Lego (25 years ago, 10-Jul-99, to lugnet.storage)
|
| |
| | Re: Loose or Clumps?
|
|
(...) I do this for pieces I don't have a large enough quantity for like brown. Hmm.. that sounded bad. -Tom McD. when replying, do not Scotchguard spamcake: a large caustic cloud ensues. (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.storage)
|
| |
| | Re: Loose or Clumps?
|
|
(...) <snippage> (...) I use clumping as a sorting method, in combination with ziplocs & drawers. As an example, in my brick storage, I keep bricks in purple tubs and have found that I can find pretty much anything in there by having the 1x1's and (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.storage)
|
| |
| | Re: Loose or Clumps?
|
|
(...) Actually, I have a bunch of the storage cases from sets 545 (6 bin) and 565 (9 bin). They hold "slugs" of bricks perfectly - 2x4 stacked 8 high - they hold 21 "slugs" in each bin = 168 2x4 in one little bin. (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.storage)
|
