Subject:
|
Re: 2nd figure in AT-ST
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:37:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
607 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Michael Nelson writes:
> I must have missed the post that said that chewie was the only figure in the
> AT-ST set. Can some one please show me that post or tell me how everyone
> came to that conclusion. Thanks
>
> Michael
I think the reason that conclusion was arrived at was because typically,
Lego will try to show ALL the minifigs included in the set when they take
pictures. I expect if the AT-ST came with another figure, the picture would
show it either on the ground by the AT-ST's feet, or sticking out of the top
'hatch'.
But I suppose it's possible that it does come with a second figure, seeing
as how nobody's ACTUALLY puchased the set yet (to the best of my knowledge).
Do you have any reason to conclude that it comes with 2 figures (or more?),
other than it would be 'foolish' of Lego not to?
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2nd figure in AT-ST
|
| (...) The strongest reason to believe it only comes with one miinifigure is that Tim Saupe over at FBTB says so. His information is very good and always(to my knowledge) correct. After the original list was leaked this summer he came out with the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | 2nd figure in AT-ST
|
| I must have missed the post that said that chewie was the only figure in the AT-ST set. Can some one please show me that post or tell me how everyone came to that conclusion. Thanks Michael (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
