 | | Re: OK, lets take it to Off Topic. —Shiri Dori
| | | | (...) <grin> I think he's ref'ing to the Taco-Bell arguement and to the language discussion... in which cases he's totally justified. :-) (of course, I'm a biased compartmentalized freak ;-) -Shiri (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: OK, lets take it to Off Topic. —Mark Sandlin
| | | | | | How can you tell? The post only says "keep it to Star Wars Lego." Fighting for off-topic rights everywhere, ~Mark (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OK, lets take it to Off Topic. —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) I don't know--that awful dog was part of the EP1 merchandising juggernaut, as were the Colonel from KFC and that Pizza Hut delivery person. By that account, they're all fair game for a Star Wars (merchandising) debate! 8^) Dave! (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OK, lets take it to Off Topic. —Scott Edward Sanburn
| | | | | (...) juggernaut, (...) 8^) Yes, in a Star Wars merchandising debate, as in I don't the dog should have been in the commericals of promoting Star Wars merchandise, but not in a "the dog is racist because he has a mexican / spanish / latin accent". (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | |
