 | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions... —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | (...) Um... The Star Wars Roleplaying Game and Sourcebook is not considered canon matieral. (Canon material means it is "real" in the Universe so is one step above "Offical" material.) The order of canon is in order of most important in the event of (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions... —Andrew Tyrone
|
| | | | | (...) What's the name of this SW encyclopedia? It sounds great and I'll probably order it. -- Agent 0007 AIM: Agent O0O7 (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions... —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | (...) in (...) false (...) and (...) by (...) computer (...) Star Wars Encyclopedia is the title. It sounds great and I'll probably order (...) Any major Book store should have it. I think it is about $30 but it is also about 3cm thick. Just rember (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions... —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) I think it's actually about $50, if it's the one I saw over the weekend. Dave! (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions... —Aaron West
|
| | | | (...) in (...) WORTHLESS!?! Excuse me, but most all of it makes more sense than gas from beans :> I don't care how "Lucas" it is, it is just a helpful and usefull sorce of information that makes my teenie brain say, " Ah, how simple." Many books (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions... —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) of (...) is (...) false (...) by (...) Oh for crying out loud. What I stated was the offical standpoint of Lucasfilm/Lucasarts. All it states is that if their is an argument information form any game is worthless as it is overridden by offical (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions... —Aaron West
|
| | | | (...) Star (...) and (...) computer (...) goof- (...) Good (...) information (...) Have they stated anything to contradict the Sourcebook information I added to discussion, or does it merely not get in the way of "canon"? If it does, please point (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A couple stupid SW questions... —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | [snip] (...) step (...) important (...) [snip] (...) Well the sourcebook is contradictory to many things that are canon so I don't put much stock in it. However anything that is explained in it with no other explaination, could and arguably should (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
