 | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | BTW, I realize that I used a non-standard, or '"incorrect" definition, if you will. Perhaps I should have called it a PEWC... but that stands for Pre-fab Explorien Wing Cockpit... so only the Cockpit moniker applies. Anyone have a better acronym for (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | (...) Well, we could just refer to it as the M-F(ing) cockpit piece. But this is a family show. :D I hadn't heard POOP defined as "Piece of One Purpose", I knew it only as the insidious "Piece of other Pieces", which is the evilest thing Lego has (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | (...) you (...) Pre-fab (...) Sounds good to me. (...) Dang. (...) as the (...) ever (...) Yeah, or how about the Adventurers car-seat thing... bleah. I have a whole bin full of POOPs and BURPs... though more of the former than the latter. ~Mark (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Adam Hoekwater
|
| | | | | (...) Hi Mark, I think that the generally accepted acronym for a big piece with one barely- reasonable purpose is SPUD (Single Purpose Ugly/Unusable Design). HTH! -Adam 8^D (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) I vote for SPUD or single purpose ugly decorative (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) I think a SPUD is more like the trees or the li'l flowers... I don't really think of a cockpit window as a "decorative" element, though it is certainly a single purpose element. How about SPUC for single purpose ugly cockpit/canopy? Doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
