 | | One more time: The 2000 A-Wing is not too small —Jason Brown
|
| | | :) Alright, I'm going to say it again, for the benifit of everyone just joining in. The new official LEGO 2000 Star Wars A-Wing ((URL) ,set 7134) is NOT to small. It is in the correct scale when compared to the X-Wing, comming in at 2.2 studs/meter (...) (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: One more time: The 2000 A-Wing is not too small —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | (...) No, the X-Wing is 12.5 meters long. This is straight from www.starwars.com. You can double check for yourself if you like. Jeff "I've had enough. I will not allow this! I will pay you back; because forgiveness, for one like you, could never be (...) (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One more time: The 2000 A-Wing is not too small —Jason Brown
|
| | | | (...) It says "12.5 from nose to engine block" but does this include the length of the engines past the body? Dosn't matter, that wouldn't be 2.5 meters... Ah, forget everything I said then. :( Show me to act like I know what I'm talking about. (...) (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One more time: The 2000 A-Wing is not too small —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | (...) Well, I think it means "nose to (the end of the) engine block". That's how I took it anyway. :) Hey, I never know what I'm talking about! ;) Jeff "This is definitely not a common spell!" (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One more time: The 2000 A-Wing is not too small —Jason Brown
|
| | | | (...) :) I've just been in a bad mood this week... personal life isn't going too great, and I'm not getting much sleep. Anyway... Darn it, 15m makes more sence given the 12.5m I have for the Z-95. :) And the Z-95 is visually smaller in the games. (...) (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
